|01,868 notes| Monday, Jan 23 at 8:16 am

What the Actual Fuck?

argonautic:

superappyjuice:

swanblood:

unknownbinaries:

“I ordered some video-editing software from Hitfilm in the UK which also comes with some instructional videos. So a few days later I get a call from FedEx saying that the DVDs were being held at U.S. Customs until I filled out a Video Declaration Form, which she said was now standard practice. Now, I’d never heard of this before, so I called back to ensure that this was indeed FedEx and not someone phishing for information. Had them email me the form.

This is what the form said: “I/we declare the the films/videos contain no obscene or immoral matter, nor any matter advocating or urging treason or insurrection against the United States, nor any threat to take the life of or inflict bodily harm upon any person in the United States.”

Now, the first clause I can kinda see, though “immoral” is weird and there’s no standard definition of obscenity in the US, but let that go…what made my eyebrows go up my forehead and down the other side was clause two. So I called back the nice lady at FedEx — who was only following instructions given to her by Customs — and asked what this was all about.

Apparently — and this is only her understanding of the situation — this is a new thing being done by Customs and Homeland Security with FedEx, UPS, and other carriers to make sure that films and videos with ideas or stories that were at odds with the United States Government didn’t get into the country, as it was a form of terrorism (as further elaborated upon in the third and final clause.) She added that some DVDs showing Occupy events in London and elsewhere had gotten bounced because of the concern that these were being used to coordinate activities here (as if with the internet people actually need physical DVDs for that sort of thing but that’s neither here nor there).

Under this new stipulation, if V for Vendetta had, for instance, been produced in the UK (instead of just filmed there), importing it into the US would be considered subject matter “advocating or urging treason or insurrection.” And if you lied about it on the form, you could be held liable for this.

So there are now very literally guardians at the gate ensuring that the wrong sorts of ideas, movies or DVDs are not allowed into the country without investigation and/or prosecution. And most pernicious of all, they don’t actually define what they mean by advocating treason or insurrection, any more than they define what “immoral” means, it’s whatever they decide it means, so you could be breaking the law without knowing you’re doing it, until they decide you’re doing it.

Thoughts?”

Thoughts: this country’s laws and things the government stands for gets more disgusting every day. Those are my thoughts.

Also, this only has a few notes and it’s someone’s personal story, so, probably good to signal boost it because it won’t be going around everywhere…

Are we becoming China or what?! 

What in the everliving fuck is this even?

WHAT THE HELL?

via hawkwardly (originally unknownbinaries)
  1. tiny-pichu reblogged this from mr-dapperman
  2. xxkitties4evaxx reblogged this from dontlookatmeimnoodles
  3. adelina-mo-trimino796 reblogged this from sanityscraps
  4. mohamed-ali-said reblogged this from enlighteningnews
  5. fallingfourth reblogged this from angrytranschick
  6. abigcorpseparty reblogged this from fussyfangs
  7. iordache reblogged this from dakreeeets
  8. bamabelle8504 reblogged this from theladygoogle
  9. dakreeeets reblogged this from theladygoogle
  10. theladygoogle reblogged this from glimmereverdeen
  11. warproduct reblogged this from specialagentparker
  12. specialagentparker reblogged this from glimmereverdeen
  13. glimmereverdeen reblogged this from sheg0
  14. missmatches reblogged this from tabzy18
  15. tabzy18 reblogged this from bcrebel
  16. heartsbeattho reblogged this from bcrebel
  17. bcrebel reblogged this from quesadildo
  18. k9gm3 reblogged this from quesadildo and added:
    The good news: since they don’t actually define the crime, they can’t convict you of anything if you’re ‘caught’.
  19. lipstickandcigarettes reblogged this from quesadildo and added:
    Everything is fuuucked
  20. soontobeme reblogged this from quesadildo and added:
    Hmmm.. No government censorship? Seems legit.
  21. babiesfrombeercans reblogged this from quesadildo
  22. cressdreiser reblogged this from sheg0
  23. quesadildo reblogged this from sheg0
  24. hungryturtle1o1 reblogged this from sheg0
  25. sheg0 reblogged this from v2kbug
  26. cielito-lullaby reblogged this from vibev
  27. vibev reblogged this from v2kbug
  28. v2kbug reblogged this from fgallaghers
  29. giver-of-armbands reblogged this from whogavemeshoes and added:
    This is upsetting, to say the least…
  30. ultaramaismoving reblogged this from misternovember
  31. misternovember reblogged this from pressdonotswallow
  32. beautifulmonster reblogged this from warlike
  33. manrynips reblogged this from saharali
  34. simply-evan reblogged this from mightymegantron
  35. intricateareyou reblogged this from righteousblasphemy and added:
    What that actual fuck.
  36. nyetlife reblogged this from eyjayy
  37. kiwibat reblogged this from eyjayy